Five companies, the same parts
Read the acquisition and launch announcements from the large data and application platforms between May 2025 and October 2026 side by side and the same shopping list repeats. Snowflake bought a Postgres company, shipped managed ingestion and a managed MCP server, and agreed to buy a company that governs agent access over MCP and another that maps lineage and discovery into its catalog. Databricks bought a Postgres company, shipped managed MCP servers under its catalog permissions, and previewed an ontology. Salesforce completed its Informatica acquisition. ServiceNow bought an enterprise assistant and a data catalog. Fivetran bought a reverse-ETL company and merged with dbt Labs.
Each move made sense on its own. Together they describe one design. It helps to derive it from first principles before looking at who bought what, because the parts follow from what an agent needs in order to do real work against company data.
What an agent needs to do real work
An agent that only answers questions needs read access and some idea of what the data means. An agent that does work needs more. It needs somewhere to write what it builds and collects: a submitted form, a reconciled table, the state an automation carries from one run to the next. It needs data and events arriving from other systems. It needs a standard way to call tools, so the same work runs whichever model is driving. It needs an identity with permissions and a record of every call, so somebody can answer for what it did. And it needs the business meaning of the data, or it will compute the wrong number with confidence.
Those five requirements map onto the five parts the platforms bought: an operational store, ingestion, managed MCP, agent governance, and a context layer.
Five parts, from what an agent needs
- 01
Operational store
Somewhere to write what it builds and collects
- 02
Ingestion
Data and events arriving from other systems
- 03
Managed MCP
A standard way for any agent to call tools
- 04
Agent governance
An identity, permissions, and a record of each call
- 05
Context layer
What the data means, in terms the business uses
The ledger
The ledger below lists the moves by company and by part. It is a record of acquisitions and launches in an eighteen-month window, not an inventory of every capability each company has; several already had parts of the design before May 2025. The pattern is in the dates. The operational store and the ingestion pieces landed first, in mid-2025. Managed MCP followed through late 2025. Governance of agent access and the context layer came in 2026.
Two vendors outside the ledger point the same way. Microsoft introduced Fabric IQ with an ontology at its core, a shared vocabulary for agents over Fabric data. Google moved Vertex AI into its Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, a single place to build, govern, and run agents.
The moves, part by part
| Part | Snowflake | Databricks | Salesforce | ServiceNow | Fivetran |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operational store | Jun 2025Agreement to acquire Crunchy Data (Postgres) Feb 2026Snowflake Postgres generally available | May 2025Agreement to acquire Neon (serverless Postgres) Jun 2025Lakebase, Postgres on Neon, in public preview | |||
| Ingestion | May 2025Openflow generally available (managed ingestion) Oct 2026Openflow Endpoints generally available (HTTP into flows) | Nov 2025Informatica acquisition completed (integration, catalog, MDM) | May 2025Agreement to acquire Census (reverse ETL) | ||
| Managed MCP | Nov 2025Snowflake-managed MCP server generally available | Jun 2025Managed MCP servers in beta, under Unity Catalog permissions | |||
| Agent governance | May 2026Intent to acquire Natoma (governance of agent access over MCP) | ||||
| Context layer | Nov 2025Agreement to acquire Select Star for Horizon Catalog | Jun 2026Genie Ontology in public preview | May 2025Agreement to acquire data.world (catalog and governance) Dec 2025Moveworks acquisition completed (enterprise assistant and search) | Jun 2026Merger with dbt Labs completed (transformation and metrics) |
The order the parts arrived
Plotted over time, the convergence is fast. In eighteen months five companies with different starting points, a warehouse, a lakehouse, a CRM, a service desk, and a pipeline business, each added the parts they lacked. None of them added the same parts in the same order, because each started from a different center.
Eighteen months, five companies
The protocol became neutral
One part changed character during the same window. In December 2025 Anthropic donated the Model Context Protocol to the Agentic AI Foundation, a directed fund under the Linux Foundation co-founded by Anthropic, Block, and OpenAI and supported by Google, Microsoft, AWS, Cloudflare, and Bloomberg. The July 2026 specification made the core stateless and added MCP Apps and Tasks as extensions, and the main SDKs were downloaded close to half a billion times a month.
That matters for the buyer more than for the vendors. When every model speaks the same protocol, the choice of model and the choice of data platform come apart. A company can pick the model that suits each task and keep its access, its permissions, and its knowledge in one place. Every platform in the ledger now ships an MCP server, so the useful comparison is what each server stands in front of.
The question is where the center sits
Every platform in the ledger assembled the five parts around its own center of gravity. The warehouse vendors built them around data that has been moved into the warehouse. The application vendors built them around the records their applications hold. The pipeline vendor built them around data in motion. Each design works best for the work that already happens at its center, and that is a sound design for a company whose work does.
Most mid-market companies are not organized around one center. Their customer record is in one vendor’s CRM, their orders in another vendor’s ERP, their history in a warehouse, their events arriving from a storefront and a dozen SaaS tools, and their people using whichever assistant they prefer. For them the useful question about the bill of materials is not which vendor has the most complete set of parts. It is whether the parts sit across the systems the work actually touches, and whether they work with every model the company will use.
The same five parts as a managed layer
Plexara delivers the same five parts as one managed deployment that sits across the systems a company already runs. Data stays in the systems that hold it, and queries reach it where it lives. What agents build and collect, from form submissions and webhook events to registered tables and automation state, is kept in the deployment beside those systems. Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and the models that replace them reach everything through one MCP endpoint under the same roles and the same audit trail. The catalog and the knowledge graph give every agent the same reviewed meaning across every system.
Deasil runs, upgrades, and monitors the deployment, so the company gets the parts without assembling them. Systems of record stay covers what moves onto those parts one workload at a time, and the capability matrix covers each category in detail.
The same five parts, across your systems
| Part | What Plexara delivers | Where it reaches |
|---|---|---|
| Operational store | Form submissions, webhook events, filed email, registered tables, automation state, and saved reports, kept in the deployment, with every table queryable in SQL | Beside the systems of record, which keep their own data |
| Ingestion | Webhook sources with named sender presets, a read-only mailbox source, forms, spreadsheets registered as tables, and automations that load from APIs | From any system that can send an event, an email, or answer an API call |
| Managed MCP | One remote MCP endpoint for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and the models that replace them, plus an MCP gateway to other vendors’ servers | In front of every connected system at once |
| Agent governance | Sign-in through your identity provider, roles that decide which tools and connections each person reaches, automations that run under their author’s saved roles, and an audit row for every call with its stated purpose | The same rules for every agent and every model |
| Context layer | A catalog of every connection with glossary, tags, domains, and lineage, and a knowledge graph that turns reviewed corrections into shared knowledge | Across every system the company connects |
Further Reading
Snowflake Openflow (General Availability)
Snowflake release notes · 2025
May 30, 2025.
Openflow Endpoints (General availability)
Snowflake release notes · 2026
October 16, 2026. Stable HTTPS URLs that route external HTTP requests into Openflow runtimes.
Snowflake Acquires Crunchy Data to Bring Enterprise Ready Postgres Offering to the AI Data Cloud
Snowflake via Business Wire · 2025
June 2, 2025.
Snowflake Postgres (General availability)
Snowflake release notes · 2026
February 24, 2026.
Snowflake-managed MCP server (General availability)
Snowflake release notes · 2025
November 4, 2025.
Snowflake to Acquire Select Star to Expand Horizon Catalog’s View of Enterprise Data
Snowflake · 2025
November 24, 2025.
Snowflake Announces Intent to Acquire Natoma
Snowflake · 2026
May 27, 2026. Natoma governs how AI agents connect to and access enterprise systems through MCP.
Databricks to Acquire Neon
TechRepublic · 2025
Announced May 14, 2025. Lakebase, built on Neon, entered public preview on June 11, 2025.
Announcing managed MCP servers with Unity Catalog and Mosaic AI integration
Databricks · 2025
June 18, 2025. Managed servers for Genie, AI Search, and Unity Catalog functions, in beta, respecting each user’s Unity Catalog permissions.
Genie Ontology
Databricks documentation · 2026
Public preview. A context layer combining semantics defined in Unity Catalog with context Genie infers from queries and dashboards.
Salesforce completes acquisition of Informatica
Seeking Alpha · 2025
November 18, 2025.
ServiceNow completes acquisition of Moveworks
ServiceNow · 2025
December 15, 2025.
ServiceNow acquires data.world two months after acquiring Moveworks
TechCrunch · 2025
May 7, 2025.
Fivetran signs agreement to acquire Census
Fivetran · 2025
May 1, 2025.
Fivetran and dbt Labs complete merger
Fivetran · 2026
June 1, 2026.
Introducing Fabric IQ: the semantic foundation for enterprise AI
Microsoft Fabric Updates Blog · 2026
An ontology item in public preview at the core of the Fabric IQ workload.
Welcome to Google Cloud Next ’26
Google Cloud · 2026
April 22, 2026. Vertex AI delivered through the Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, built to build, scale, govern, and optimize agents.
MCP joins the Agentic AI Foundation
Model Context Protocol blog · 2025
December 9, 2025. A directed fund under the Linux Foundation, co-founded by Anthropic, Block, and OpenAI, supported by Google, Microsoft, AWS, Cloudflare, and Bloomberg.
Model Context Protocol blog: protocol releases
Model Context Protocol · 2026
The 2026-07-28 specification: a stateless core, MCP Apps and Tasks as extensions, and Tier 1 SDKs at close to half a billion downloads a month.
