A 2,000-processor NiFi system, replaced
NewIf you have built a workflow in Workato or n8n, you know the shape: boxes on a canvas, each one a step, wired together into a pipeline. Apache NiFi is the same idea built for heavier data work. This client moved from Workato to NiFi within the past year because NiFi handled more sophisticated flows, and their installation grew to roughly two thousand of those boxes, which NiFi calls processors: feeds in, transformations, lookups, and loads into the warehouse. Every change meant opening the canvas, tracing the flow by hand, and hoping nothing downstream depended on the piece you were about to touch.
Canvas tools like these exist because of a tradeoff. Custom software could do anything, but it was expensive to build and harder still to develop, test, and maintain properly, so teams accepted a canvas and its limits instead. An agent working inside the right guardrails removes that tradeoff. On Plexara you get the power of custom code without paying developers to write it or to keep it running: the agent writes it, every version is tested against real runs before it can be saved, and you approve any change in what it does. That code also works natively with your entire data estate: the warehouse, the catalog and its business definitions, your files, and every API connection your team has set up, under the same access controls as everything else.
That work now runs as Plexara automations. The agent read each flow, wrote the script that does the same job in Starlark, a small, readable scripting language, and ran it beside the old flow. A flow was switched off only after a recorded comparison showed the new output matched the old rows. One flow at a time, the canvas emptied out.
The difference shows up after cutover. Each automation is a short script with a version history and a record of every run: what triggered it, what it read, what it wrote, and how it ended. A failure arrives as an email with the reason and the log. Maintenance is a conversation: "the settlement load ran long last night, find out why and fix it." The agent reads the run record, proposes the change, and tests it against previous runs. If the fix would change what the automation does, you get a plain-language summary and decide whether it goes ahead. Nobody has to read code to approve it.
See Automations, and Plexara compared with pipeline tools for how this differs from putting an agent next to a flow product.


